Taking 10 samples from a 1nS counter leads you to a 100pS resolution but the noise at best (if it is really random) is reduced by SQRT(10). So, as already pointed out here, there is no real substitute for lower noise, higher resolution measurements.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Bob Camp <li...@rtty.us> wrote: > Hi > > A 1 ns resolution TI counter will do the measuring part just fine. Hitting > the number, is where it gets a bit crazy. A *good* GPSDO might get near > that. > > Bob > > On Oct 3, 2012, at 8:56 PM, Kevin Rosenberg <ke...@rosenberg.net> wrote: > > > On Oct 3, 2012, at 6:52 PM, Kevin Rosenberg <ke...@rosenberg.net> wrote: > >> Nice plot! Yes, I'd have trouble measuring 10E-14 at 10E5 seconds. > > > > Sorry, 1E-14 at 1E5. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
