Sarah,
On 10/25/2012 06:44 PM, Sarah White wrote:
1)
Thanks magnus. This is something I'm quite interested in:
I'm not the only one doing testing for Microsoft NT 5.x and higher
against NTP-type synchronization. It's actually high enough quality such
that a Windows server running NTP with a refclock provides significantly
better time than the public NTP servers.
Here are a few writeups I've been using for reference, and I've been
testing and duplicating some of the listed configurations, hoping for my
own writeups:
http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/NTP-on-Windows-Vista.html (basic timing)
http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/NTP-on-Windows-serial-port.html (connected
to refclock, timing was better than 50 microseconds jitter, averaging
less than 10 microseconds)
Am actively in the process of getting everything to replace my own
"navigation" GPS refclock with a timing mode one. At this point I just
need to find a good antenna...
That's a whole lot of information there. Many thanks for those links.
Cheers,
Magnus
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
