As far as I can see the PLL loop filter (SR620) has a corner frequency of about 33Hz. My HP counter 5385A has simply a switch to toggle between the external source and the internal osc.




Am 18.11.2012 22:45, schrieb Bob Camp:
Hi

Most modern counters have an internal oscillator that they lock up to the 
external reference. The PLL bandwidth is (hopefully) chosen to optimize the 
noise contribution of the internal oscillator (quiet broad band) and the 
external reference (quiet close in). It will reject anything MHz away from the 
reference. Even if the reference signal is used directly, it would only be a 
problem if divided by an odd number. Even number division will wipe out the 
jitter. The most likely gate times are all a power of 10, so the division 
should always be even in a counter. Bottom line - you are unlikely to run into 
trouble using 10 MHz out of a Z3805 as reference signal.

Crazy stuff….

Bob

On Nov 18, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Volker Esper<[email protected]>  wrote:


...A PLL multiplier will (likely) also ignore the sub-harmonic, the
jitter will not show up if you use the 10 MHz as a counter timebase
in a HP counter...


Yes, I wondered what the histogram would show when using the 2-maxima-Z3805 
signal as a reference for the SR620 counter. Would the PLL filter it or would I 
get a mixer-like result with two maxima in the histogram?

I applied the Z3805 to the reference input and the SMX signal generator to the 
counter input. The histogram looked equal to that I got when using the internal 
oscillator of the counter for reference.

That obviously confirms Bob's statement.

Volker



Am 18.11.2012 21:23, schrieb Bob Camp:
Hi

This is one of those interesting areas where a broadband measurement (like a 
counter) and a narrowband measurement (like a DMTD) will give very different 
results. The counter will see the sub-harmonic, and call it jitter. It can show 
up in an ADEV calculation. A DMTD will ignore the sub-harmonic, and show no 
added jitter. With a DMTD, the ADEV will look fine. A PLL multiplier will 
(likely) also ignore the sub-harmonic, the jitter will not show up if you use 
the 10 MHz as a counter timebase in a HP counter.

Which one's right / does it matter - as always, that depends on what you are 
trying to do with the signal.

Bob

On Nov 18, 2012, at 1:26 PM, Volker Esper<[email protected]>   wrote:


@Azelio: Yes, (like Bob told) it's the phase lock, that locks the two maxima. 
Actually the counter is able to look between the 60ps spaced towers, have a 
look at the pictures in the first mail of this thread. However, there is a 
smallest time value the counter can determine, but it is much smaller than 60ps.

Volker



Am 18.11.2012 17:11, schrieb Bob Camp:
Hi

The 5 MHz and 10 MHz are "locked together" by the multiplier. Their relative 
phase is fixed. The 5 MHz component is not free to wander independently relative to the 
10 MHz.  Since it's a doubler, you get a two peak plot. If it was a X3 you would get 
three peaks.  It really only makes sense if you look at it on a scope. Of course at 60 
ps, it would have to be a mighty good scope. Much easier to see when the sub-harmonic is 
a bit stronger...

Bob

On Nov 18, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Azelio Boriani<[email protected]>    wrote:

Interesting this, but why exactly 60pS? I would expect also something
in-between. That is, to have the 5MHz energy 64dB below, in my opinion
nothing prevents to have the edge to wander not only at 60pS but
continuously between 0 and 60pS. Maybe the SR620, being a 25pS resolution
counter, simply doesn't see what's going on in-between and the resulting
histogram looks that way.

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Bob Camp<[email protected]>    wrote:

Hi

A little more detail:

What's going on is more clear if you trigger a scope on the positive edge
of the 5 MHz and look at the 10 MHz. With an ideal multiplier, both the
positive and negative edges of the 5 MHz should line up exactly with a
positive edge of the 10 MHz. In reality, negative edge (the one not
triggered) does not quite line up. It's a bit ahead (or behind) the ideal
location. Since it's a small angle, the delta in phase and delta in
amplitude both follow the same basic law.

Bob


On Nov 17, 2012, at 9:36 PM, Bob Camp<[email protected]>    wrote:

Hi

Just good old Fourier series.

Bob

On Nov 17, 2012, at 9:12 PM, Volker Esper<[email protected]>    wrote:


I'm impressed - but what law is behind this?


Am 17.11.2012 21:26, schrieb Bob Camp:
Hi

60 db isn't to bad a number. More or less:

100 ns ->     100 ps is 1000:1. 20 log of that is 60 db. 100 ps to 60 ps
is about 4.4 db. That would sum up to -64.4 dbc. The main gotcha is that
you *might* also have some 15 MHz (and higher) energy in the signal as
well. Also phase gets into the calculation.  Still, pretty close.

Bob

On Nov 17, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Volker Esper<[email protected]>     wrote:


So let's have a look into the machine... and what do we see? There's
a nice little Symmetrcom oven, with the sign reading "5.000 MHz" - bingo!

May be there's a time saving way to determine the energie of the sub
harmonic: using my spectrum analyzer. It tells me, that there's a 5 MHz
subharmonic at the level of -62dBc.

How would you have calculated the energy? What would be your ansatz?

Thanks so far

Volker


Am 17.11.2012 17:55, schrieb Bob Camp:
Hi

That's what you get if you have "sub harmonic" energy in the output
of your OCXO. I'd bet you a warm glass of beer that you have a 5 MHz /
doubled to 10 MHz MTI OCXO in your Z3805.  If you have a lot of time on
your hands, you can calculate the likely level of the energy from the
amount of jitter (spacing between the two peaks) you get.

Bob

On Nov 17, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Volker Esper<[email protected]>
wrote:

Hi,

while playing with my recently aquired TIC (SR620) and measuring
the period time of some oscillators I discovered something I hadn't expect
at all:

The output of my GPSDO (Z3805) writes two maxima in the period
histogram (at a spacing of 60ps).

I didn't believe that result and assumed an inherent error in my
measuring setup or the counter itself.

So I plugged another oscillator, the reference TCXO of my signal
generator (R&S SMX), and that result made me happy and uneasy at once: The
TCXO hat only one maximum.

I havn't calculated the ADEV curve, yet.

See pictures.

Why does my GPSDO produce such a weird result?

Cheers

Volker - DF9PL

<DSCF1437_bbb.jpg><DSCF1439_bbb.jpg>_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.





_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.





_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.





_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.





_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.





_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to