Its actually Tau with a subscript 0.
This is the the time interval between successive measurements.
e.g. if a measurement is taken every second then Tau0 is 1 sec.

Bruce

Edgardo Molina wrote:
Dear John Ackermann,

I find your reply to my request to be very interesting. Without fear of asking. 
May I know how do I achieve a Tau 0 measurement in a 1 second interval with my 
setup? (HP-53132A + TimeLab).

Please tell me if I am wrong.  I assume I would take the 10 MHz output from the 
53132A and plug it into the Channel 1 input, while the external reference of 10 
MHz is disconnected.

As far as I am concerned, TimeLab does not allow a value of 0 for Tau. If I 
enter zero as the measurement time duration I get an error and actual 
acceptable Tau range. The smaller value is in the order of 1E-6s. Am I getting 
it right? I am sorry for my confusion.

Regards,



Edgardo Molina
Dirección IPTEL

www.iptel.net.mx

T : 55 55 55202444
M : 04455 10045822

Piensa en Bits SA de CV



Información anexa:




CONFIDENCIALIDAD DE INFORMACION

Este mensaje tiene carácter confidencial. Si usted no es el destinarario de 
este mensaje, le suplicamos se lo notifique al remitente mediante un correo 
electrónico y que borre el presente mensaje y sus anexos de su computadora sin 
retener una copia de los mismos. Queda estrictamente prohibido copiar este 
mensaje o hacer usode el para cualquier propósito o divulgar su en forma 
parcial o total su contenido. Gracias.


NON-DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION

This email is strictly confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not 
the intended recipient please immediately advise the sender by replying to this 
e-mail and then deleting the message and its attachments from your computer 
without keeping a copy. It is strictly forbidden to copy it or use it for any 
purpose or disclose its contents to any third party. Thank you.






On Nov 14, 2012, at 8:13 PM, John Ackermann N8UR<[email protected]>  wrote:

Edgardo, the minimum sample rate in practice is determined by the noise floor 
of the measurement system.  I would suggest that you do a baseline test by 
measuring the counter reference against itself with a tau0 (sample rate) of 1 
second.  You'll see a best-case result and from it you can determine at which 
sample rate your noise floor is better than the predicted performance of the 
oscillator under test.  You'll probably find that you are measurement-noise 
limited below several hundred seconds.

Also, you'll generally get a lower noise floor doing time interval rather than frequency 
measurements, so you might experiment with that, which normally involves using a low-rate signal 
such as PPS for "start" and "stop" channels.

John

On Nov 14, 2012, at 8:43 PM, Edgardo Molina<[email protected]>  wrote:

Dear Group,

Now that I have setup TimeLab along with the Prologix GPIB to USB adapter and 
the HP-53132A frecuency counter, I am starting to get some data from my 
frequency standards. Still I think I have a long way to go in front of me.

One of the main concerns that cross my mind at this point are:

a. What is the recommended sampling duration to consider for Quartz, Rubidium  
and other types of oscillators?
b. What are the recommended sampling intervals for the above mentioned 
oscillator types?
c. I am using a 10 MHz Rb FE-5806A frequency standard as an external reference 
for the HP-53132A.
d. I am connecting my DUT at the frequency counter channel 1
e. I am setting Timelab for Data Type = Frequency
f. My graphs somehow have the same geometry of classical ADEV examples, I can 
differentiate the ADEV noise types quite easily.
g. Should I use sub-second sampling intervals for my graphs to start closer to 
the vertical axis of the graph? Or should I use a conservative 1s sampling rate?

With the previous questions I am looking for consistency in my ADEV studies. 
Are there any typical ADEV conditions to be considered when analysing this way?
Am I missing something? My apologies to everybody if I am missing something or 
doing it the wrong way. In the end I want to learn more than anything else.

Your kind comments are welcome. Thank you.

Best regards,



Edgardo Molina
Dirección IPTEL

www.iptel.net.mx

T : 55 55 55202444
M : 04455 10045822

Piensa en Bits SA de CV



Información anexa:




CONFIDENCIALIDAD DE INFORMACION

Este mensaje tiene carácter confidencial. Si usted no es el destinarario de 
este mensaje, le suplicamos se lo notifique al remitente mediante un correo 
electrónico y que borre el presente mensaje y sus anexos de su computadora sin 
retener una copia de los mismos. Queda estrictamente prohibido copiar este 
mensaje o hacer usode el para cualquier propósito o divulgar su en forma 
parcial o total su contenido. Gracias.


NON-DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION

This email is strictly confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not 
the intended recipient please immediately advise the sender by replying to this 
e-mail and then deleting the message and its attachments from your computer 
without keeping a copy. It is strictly forbidden to copy it or use it for any 
purpose or disclose its contents to any third party. Thank you.






_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to