>>Although the Trimble oscillator has superb phase noise 
>>performance,  it has TERRIBLE temperature sensitivity.

> It appears that most do but some don't.  Between the results I have 
> seen posted on the list (Lady Heather screen shots) and my own data, 
> they seem to fall into two groups.  I have two with excellent 
> oscillator tempcos, but a third unit I have is about 100x worse and 
> the sign of its tempco is reversed compared to the first two.  That 

Mark, Charles,

This is interesting and I'd like to pursue it. I still have a pile of original 
TAPR-Thunderbolts here so without too much effort I can gather tempco 
statistics for you. I tested the TAPR lots for phase noise and ADEV and DS1620 
granularity, but did not test free-run tempco of the OCXO.

<rant> Please don't use the word "TERRIBLE". It's relative to XO, TCXO, OCXO, 
DOCXO, etc. This is time-nuts, not some feel-good audiophile list. We are 
allowed to make objective experiments and use scientific notation. The units 
for tempco involve Hz and C, or dF/F per K, etc. Given that, do either of you 
have actual tempco numbers? </rant>

Bob, do you have experience or an explanation for the bi-model tempco grouping 
that they have observed?

Thanks,
/tvb


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to