On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Attila Kinali <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 07:53:40 -0400 (EDT) > [email protected] wrote: > >> In a message dated 3/25/2013 7:09:41 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >> [email protected] writes: >> >> > The lack of synchronisers when crossing clock domains is a design flaw >> > that should be corrected. >> >> Bruce, would you mind being more specific and offer a solution.
I think Brooks' solution was to drive the phase of the two clocks to be 1024 counts apart. I think it selected "1024" and not zero just for this reason. If by chance the two are in phase to start with the built-in randomness of the 24MHz clock saves the day and then the control loop forces them eventually to be not in phase by 1024/24M seconds -- Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
