The circuit is something like the instrumentation amplifier. The description 
starts on page 207 with a schematic on page 208. I can scan it later, but the 
circuit is easy to describe. Think of two op amps in the classic current 
multiplication (I to V)  circuit, that is positive input to ground and a 
resistor from output to negative input. Now place the diode between the two 
negative inputs. The current flow will cause the outputs of the op amp to move 
differentially, which can then be made single ended with an op amp circuit. But 
the thing to keep in mind is that the voltage potential across the photodiode 
has been kept to zero, so the capacitance doesn't matter. But it is only held 
to zero as long as the amplifier has loop gain, that is create the virtual 
ground, hence you need a high GBP for the capacitance to be neutralized. 

Now I haven't seen this published, but it seems to me if you wanted a negative 
bias across the diode, you could just use a transformer. I ran into a patent on 
transformer coupled photodiode circuitry. It was for high speed flash 
detection. (Amazing was common sense obvious design technique can be patented.) 

The bootstrap technique basically takes the virtual ground signal of the  
current multiplier circuit and replicates the AC portion of the virtual ground 
on the other side of the photodiode, keeping the AC signal across the diode at 
zero volts, but letting the current flow into the circuit to be multiplied by 
the op amp&resistor. 

Since the bootstrap needs to "sample" the virtual ground, it itself can't steal 
any current from that point, so it usually employs a JFET. 

These amplifier circuits usually go down to DC, so they will also have response 
to ambient light, which could eat into the dynamic range of the circuit. 

Linear Technology app notes use the bootstrap often. They use a common low 
noise JFET from NXP. Noise from the bootstrap adds right to the diode, so the 
bootstrap components need to be low noise.  The fully differential circuit 
doesn't have the bootstrap noise source, but it has two amplifiers on the front 
end, hence two uncorrelated noise sources. 

Going back to the fully differential circuit, you could bias the diode by 
placing the positive inputs of the I to V circuits at different potentials, 
then reject the DC components at the double ended to single ended converter by 
capacitive coupling. You would probably want to meditate on start up issues if 
the DC bias is large, that is use clamping diodes on the double ended to single 
ended converter if it looks like something will be stressed on start up.

When you read the photodiode literature, bandwidth is stated into an impedance, 
so I think they just treat the capacitance as the limiting factor. Maybe that 
is real life, or maybe it is oversimplified. At that point this is a solid 
state physics problem and not a circuit design issue. (I'd have to crack a book 
on the physics.)

------Original Message------
From: Attila Kinali
To: [email protected]
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Photodiodes for high frequency OPLL
Sent: Mar 30, 2013 12:03 PM

On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 17:29:45 +0000
[email protected] wrote:

> You lose me at damping per decade? Is damping the right word?
> Do you mean high frequency rolloff?

Er.. yes. Frequency rolloff... Sorry, my native language got the better of me.


> Most texts on photodiodes go into bootstrapping them to reduce the
> effect of capacitance. But if you design fully differential amplifier
> circuits, they have the same effect as bootstrapping. Jerald Graeme's
> "Photodiode Amplifiers" goes into this. I'm not a fan of Gain technology
> as a company, but Graeme's book are good texts. 

Thanks! I just ordered this book.
Although i will have to build a discrete amplifier for the first stage
until i can mix the signal down to something that can be handled easier.

> The bootstrapping circuits use simpler buffers to keep the voltage
> potential across the diode low, while the fully differential circuits
> depend on gain bandwidth product to do the same.

Well, as i currently lean torwards using an avalanche photodiode,
which needs an operating voltage in the range of 100V, keeping the
potential accross the diode low is not really an issue :-)

How do the fully differential circuits get to keep the potential low?
As far as i can tell, from the circuits i've seen so far, the differential
circuits just use the single ended signal from the diode take the difference
to a bias voltage.


                        Attila Kinali
-- 
The people on 4chan are like brilliant psychologists
who also happen to be insane and gross.
                -- unknown

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to