Another update... I wanted to post more in the hopes that it may help someone else with similar problems.

I told you about adding the simple voltage divider to reduce the drive to the circuits following the replacement of the original oscillator module. When I thought all was well I put the DATUM 9390-52054 back in the rack and it locked up quickly. I soon discovered that I didn't have enough output to lock some of my externally referenced equipment. A comparison between my two 9390's showed that the repaired one was about 15 dB low in output! Just for fun I removed the voltage divider and ran the replacement oscillator's output directly to the following circuitry, just as the original oscillator did. Testing, which I fully expected to give me the problem of driving the DAC and EFC voltage out of range, showed that all was well and the 9390's output levels were within a dB of DATUM's specs. So, what happened earlier that caused me to think it was being over-driven. I haven't any idea! I've run it through several power cycles, some overnight, and it always comes back up with such happiness, and with the DAC around 28400 and the EFC at 2.15 volts - right where it's supposed to be. The only thing I can think of is that I did something foolish in my initial testing with the replacement oscillator. The unit has been sitting in the rack for over 48 hours with no issues. According to it's screen the frequency error is 1E-12 and the output level is where it should be.

Thanks to everyone for your input, you've given me a good understanding of how this particular GPS module works. I hope my experience will be of some value down the road. I'll keep you posted on any further 9390 adventures.

Thanks,

Burt, K6OQK

I had earlier written:
When I powered the 9390 up everything seemed to work and the oscillator was within 1-Hertz, except that the output was about 20 dB higher than with the original oscillator was when it was working properly. Once the receiver locked up to 4 satellites and started "OSC Stabilizing", the oscillator suddenly jumped about 18 Hz low and shortly afterwards the DAC went to all zeros. I let it sit all night figuring that it would eventually find itself. Well, it didn't, it just sat at 18 Hz low and the DAC at all zeros, and the EFC (Electronic Frequency Control) voltage at 0.19 Volts. (What a revolting development!)

Very early this AM I got up and put a simple 10:1 voltage divider using a series 680 Ohm and 68 Ohm resistor from the oscillator's RF out to ground This brought the levels pretty much back to the same as my good 9390. I also substituted a pot for the EFC voltage. I used a 1 K pot in series with a 300 Ohm resistor to the 5 Volt rail. The resistor was on the high side, the bottom end to ground, and the wiper to the EFC terminal. I was able to tune the oscillator to precisely 10 MHz long enough to measure the substitute EFC at +2.15 Volts. Leaving it hooked up this way I let the receiver do it's thing just to see what would happen. It went through it's normal routine and finally the green lock light came on. Although the oscillator wasn't being controlled by the 9390, the 9390 thought it was happy and the DAC went to about 28,000 - very close to ideal. I tweaked the pot hither and yon to move the frequency and to see which way the EFC voltage went. It went the right direction to properly steer the oscillator and should have worked.

Pondering the situation, I powered the 9390 down and reconnected the 9390's EFC voltage back up to see what would happen this time. This time it locked up quickly and the oscillator homed in on 10 MHz. The EFC voltage is 2.15 Volts and the DAC settled in nicely at 28302 - very close to the recommended DAC numbers. It's been cooking for about an hour now and is presently at 112E-12 and moving closer all the time. When comparing the two GPS receivers I am not seeing the random drifts that I had seen in the past.

I suspect that the problem with the frequency jumping to -18 Hz and the DAC going to all zeros was the result of the new oscillator over-driving the following circuitry. In hindsight, maybe I should have probed a bit with the scope to see if that is a correct assumption, but I didn't do that.

By the way, Stu sells the oscillators fully tested and with a note giving the EFC voltage for each unit to tune it to 10 MHz. If this turns out to be as good a modification as it now appears, I'm going to get more of the oscillators from him. I may replace the one in my other 9390 and for sure will replace internal reference oscillator in my IFR-1500 Service Monitor.

Burt, K6OQK


Burt I. Weiner Associates
Broadcast Technical Services
Glendale, California  U.S.A.
[email protected]
www.biwa.cc
K6OQK
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to