On 04/28/2013 02:01 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 17:50:06 +1200
Bruce Griffiths<bruce.griffi...@xtra.co.nz>  wrote:

Has anyone considered a laser pumped variant like:
http://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/1009.pdf

Apart from the ECDL laser (can be assembled using readily availalble
parts) it looks fairly straightforward.

Considered, yes, tried, no. From what i've read sofar, this system
has the problem of locking the laser wavelength onto the right
absorbtion line. IIRC the linewidth of Rb in a vapor cell is a couple
of 10kHz to a few 100kHz. Using an ECDL you get a laser linewidth of
less than 1MHz easily, usally in the range of a few 100kHz and less.
Ie. the laser would need to be kept on the absorption line with a stability
of a couple of 100kHz at most. Using just a laser diode (without the
external cavity) with its linewidth of>100MHz makes it actually a
little bit easier to handle.

But getting the laser to the right Rb absorption line and detecting whether
it's off is still not solved. Most of the papers that i've read that do
something similar use an additional vapor cell to determine the correct
position of the laser.

I'm quite sure that it could be done with a single vapor cell using
some sophisticated control loop that steers both the 6.9Ghz signal
and the laser wavelength, but i doubt it's easy. But then, i didn't
have an in depth look at this.

When being at NIST last summer, they had us tour the facility. One of them was not as much a show but a physical lab. We got to trim up and test laser-cooling of... rubidium vapour. It was about 100000 of hardware on the table if I recall correctly, but nothing really advanced really. A secondary rubidium cell was used as a detector for the right rubidium features. Using that and tune two lasers with lock in amplifiers also having sweep features, it became fairly simple to do. More than half the table of equipment does not apply to a rubidium clock anyway, so the set up could be rationalized down considerably.

We succeeded to laser-cool both the Rb-87 and Rb-85 :)

Turned out that once you got about the right wavelengths and fairly balanced polarization, much other things like the magnetic field-strength was not very critical at all to achieve and maintain the effect.

It was a fun lab to do, and I wish to learn more about steering laser wavelengths etc. I do far to little optical stuff.

It is also interesting that our optically pumped rubidiums is in fact more closely related to modern atomic standards than traditional caesium beams. The fountains is really a cross of them both to some degree.

Cheers,
Magnus
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to