It doesn't affect the general magnitude conclusions by Bruce, but as
long as we are making corrections, my calculator seems to think
60 * 60 * 24 * 12 = 1036800 seconds in 12 days, not 1024800. That does
come out to 115.7 days for 1 sec error. Maybe the 12-day number was a typo?
-Rex
On 4/30/2013 12:57 PM, Bruce Griffiths wrote:
12 days is 1024800 s ie just over 1 million seconds so a frequency
offset of 0.1ppm results in a time error of ~ 0.1s not 1s.
1sec error would occur in just under 116 days,
Bruce
Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
If you take a look down in the fine print on the OCXO spec, the aging
rate
is 100 ppb / year in the first year. If you are off by 0.1 ppm (100 ppb)
your clock will gain a second in less than 12 days.
Bob
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
