On 5/1/2013 8:43 AM, Stephen Tompsett (G8LYB) wrote: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/05/01/hoptroff_shows_first_atomic_watch_movement/ >
Stephen, fellow time nuts, [DISCLAIMER] I should really know better than to attempt internet discussions or comments first thing after waking up. Didn't stop me today though (oops) So... Did I just make a fool of myself? Was I mistaken? I tweeted the author of this article, trying to point out that (as I understand) "radioactive decay" is not relevant in any way for cesium frequency standard/reference thingies: https://twitter.com/kuzetsa/status/329618223916011520 If someone more authoritative and/or experienced (or at least more awake) wanted, please let me know if I was confused and such --Sarah _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
