Hi Something like 48 hours is a good idea *if* you have the time to do them.
Bob On May 5, 2013, at 7:34 AM, Miguel Barbosa Gonçalves <m...@mbg.pt> wrote: > On 5 May 2013 11:51, Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > >> In message <8311230247672528820@unknownmsgid>, >> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Miguel_Barbosa_Go >> n=E7alves?= writes: >> >>> This receiver has the possibility of averaging it's position before >>> entering what Trimble calls the overdetermined clock state. The >>> default is to average the position with 2000 fixes. >>> >>> What do you believe is a good number of fixes for the survey in this case? >> >> It will be enough for error detection and it will stabilize your >> signal somewhat, but it is not even remotely close to giving you >> a precise position which will attenuate the 12h wiggles from the >> satellite orbits. >> > > Hi Poul! > > So you think a full day of position survey will be better? > > The receiver will still output time while surveying so doing it for a long > time is not a problem. > > Appreciate your input. > > Cheers, > Miguel > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.