http://www.navipedia.net/index.php/WAAS_Signal_Structure

Doppler Shift: The Doppler shift, as perceived by a stationary user, on the 
signal broadcast by WAAS GEOs is less than 40 meters per second (≈210 Hz at L1) 
in the worst case (at the end of life of the GEOs). The Doppler shift is due to 
the relative motion of the GEO. 
Carrier Frequency Stability: The short term stability of the carrier frequency 
(square root of the Allan Variance) at the input of the user´s receiver antenna 
will be better than 5x10-11 over 1 to 10 seconds, excluding the effects of the 
ionosphere and Doppler. 
Polarization: The broadcast signal is right-handed circularly polarized. The 
ellipticity will be no worse than 2 dB for the angular range of ±9.1o from 
boresight. 
Code/Carrier Frequency Coherence: The lack of coherence between the broadcast 
carrier phase and the code phase shall be limited. The short term (<10sec) 
fractional frequency difference between the code phase rate and the carrier 
frequency shall be less than 5x10-11 (one sigma). Over the long term (<100 
sec), the difference between the change in the broadcast code phase (convert to 
carrier cycles) and the change in the broadcast carrier phase shall be within 
one carrier cycle (one sigma). 
Correlation Loss: Correlation loss is defined as the ratio of output powers 
from a perfect correlator for two cases: 1) the actual receiver WAAS signal 
correlated against a perfect unfiltered PN reference, or 2) a perfect 
unfiltered PN signal normalized to the same total power as the WAAS signal in 
case 1. The correlation loss resulting from modulation imperfections and 
filtering inside the WAAS satellite payload is less than 1 dB. 

John WA4WDL

---- Bob Camp <[email protected]> wrote: 
> Hi
> 
> The pipe in this case is up on one frequency and down on another. The 
> conversion oscillator on satellite that's the weak link, no matter how good 
> the signal from the ground happens to be. 
> 
> Bob
> 
> On Jul 3, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Attila Kinali <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 08:29:02 -0400
> > Bob Camp <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> >> There are two batches of GPS / WAAS sats up there:
> >> 
> >> 1) The ones with numbers above 100 that are geosync and that only do WAAS
> >> 
> >> 2) The ones with numbers <= 32 that do nav. These are not geosync. 
> >> 
> >> I believe the only ones with corrected / high stab clocks on board are
> >> those in the second group. The stuff in the first group aren't dedicated
> >> sats, just leased transponders on conventional multipurpose geosync birds. 
> > 
> > I don't know about WAAS, but AFAIK the EGNOS signals are generated on
> > ground using Cs references and retransmitted by the satelites using
> > a "bend pipe". Ie. the signals should be of time-nut quality even without
> > high accuracy frequency standards in the birds themselves.
> > 
> > (Sorry, i'm not able to find where i read about that, so no references 
> > today)
> > 
> >                     Attila Kinali
> > 
> > -- 
> > The people on 4chan are like brilliant psychologists
> > who also happen to be insane and gross.
> >             -- unknown
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe, go to 
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to