Burt, I agree there is money, but, far more importantly IMO, there is lots of political power.
IMO, if one assessed risks objectively, biological pathogens are far, far more dangerous. In fact, I think it's the height of hypocracy when biologists protest nuclear technology. Consider which has killed and injured more people: radiation or pathogens? It's not even close. Pathogens win hands down. YMMV, -John ===================== > John, > > Unfortunately, there's a lot of money in fear. Being in broadcast > engineering I learned as long time ago to never use the words, > "radiation" or "radiate" a signal when referring to a station's > signal. Instead, I refer to it as, "Launch" or "Launched" a > signal. When asked about a radio station's radiation I remind them > about the expression, "radiate a smile". It simply means, " to send > out". If you really want to frighten people, use the expression, "To > radiate SPAM!" > > Burt, K6OQK > > At 06:21 AM 7/9/2013, [email protected] wrote >>Radiation is a fact of life. It is used as a boogieman by some, to suit >>their agendas. >> >>-John > > Burt I. Weiner Associates > Broadcast Technical Services > Glendale, California U.S.A. > [email protected] > www.biwa.cc > K6OQK > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
