Hi

Ok, let's put some numbers on this:

1) The original post was about an OCXO (as opposed to a VCXO or VCO).
2) One would *assume* that only stable OCXO's are of interest to this group… 
:)….
3) Single ovens with 1x10^-9 per percent delta V are "not so stable", parts 
with 1x10^-11 per percent are quite possible. 
4) Supply voltages around 12 volts are pretty common
5) < 1.0x10^-13 at one second is doing pretty good on an OCXO

>From that one can do some math.

One percent of 12 volts is 120 mv. 
One mv will be < 1.0x10^-11 on the "not so stable" OCXO and < 1.0X10^-14 on the 
stable one.

Is your supply good to 1 mv? Most of my lab supplies are. If so, that's 
probably good enough. If you have a poor supply, many common 3 terminal 
regulators are amazingly stable under normal lab conditions. I *know* that my 
batteries aren't stable to 1 mv over days with an OCXO pulling current off of 
them. Regulator changes voltage with temperature? So do batteries and OCXO's 
and lab supplies. 

Bob

On Jul 11, 2013, at 3:39 PM, Max Robinson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ed.  I for one am getting all of your messages.  Perhaps your spam filter is 
> taking them out for some reason.
> 
> Regards.
> 
> Max.  K 4 O DS.
> 
> Email: [email protected]
> 
> Transistor site http://www.funwithtransistors.net
> Vacuum tube site: http://www.funwithtubes.net
> Woodworking site 
> http://www.angelfire.com/electronic/funwithtubes/Woodworking/wwindex.html
> Music site: http://www.maxsmusicplace.com
> 
> To subscribe to the fun with transistors group send an email to.
> [email protected]
> 
> To subscribe to the fun with tubes group send an email to,
> [email protected]
> 
> To subscribe to the fun with wood group send a blank email to
> [email protected]
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "ed breya" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Lead acid battery noise levels
> 
> 
>> Third attempt at emailing again:
>> 
>> NiCd batteries should have the lowest noise for their size due to low 
>> resistance, but if you look at ever-lower frequency, the Hg should be 
>> superior since it has the most stable voltage with time and temperature. 
>> Drift (including self-discharge) and temperature variation response can 
>> appear as very low frequency noise independent of the other noise sources 
>> and operating conditions. Hg batteries are so stable that they were commonly 
>> used as voltage references or to power small circuits without any additional 
>> regulation needed.
>> 
>> Ed
>> 
>> >Mike Feher wrote:
>> 
>> A long time ago, when I was concerned about a phase noise issue, I found an
>> old NBS article. It was on measuring phase noise and included a schematic of
>> an ultra-low noise amplifier. In that amplifier they used Mercury batteries.
>> I also glanced at the referenced article, stating NiCad is the lowest noise,
>> and, NiCads were available for a long time, yet they used Mercury. Regards
>> - Mike
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to