I don't think the state of the art is exceeding the need. Because by nature that is part of what ham radio is. Experimentation is part of the game.
Nothing wrong with appliance operators, if one chooses to be that. There are plenty of appliance radios out there. SDR just may not be there yet. Of course, lots of the 'modern' radios include technology that was once state of the art, and had problems at. As for time-nuts and radio, I think SDR is a great place to tie them together. Dan N8XJK On 8/7/2013 12:00 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 08:25:13 -0700 > From: "Burt I. Weiner" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: [time-nuts] SDR Radio Opinion- Next Question... > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > > Chris and all, > > It seems to me that a lot of the new software is being developed by > people who don't live in the real world or don't use the end product > in the real world - or maybe not at all. Maybe I'm just old and > senile, but a lot of the stuff I'm seeing is not intuitive, stable or > even consistent. > > Is the State of The Art exceeding the state of the need? > > Burt, K6OQK _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
