Hi

Never rule out a bug on the EFC line. Spiders are sometimes found in odd places 
….

Bob

On Aug 31, 2013, at 2:16 PM, Bob Stewart <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Said,
> 
> Thanks for the input!  I thought I had remembered someone's post about 
> crystal jump, but I wasn't sure.
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: Said Jackson <[email protected]>
>> To: Bob Stewart <[email protected]>; Discussion of precise time and frequency 
>> measurement <[email protected]> 
>> Cc: Time Nuts <[email protected]> 
>> Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 1:12 PM
>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Caring for the elderly (OCXO)
>> 
>> 
>> Bob,
>> 
>> Pretty standard behavior for some crystals. I recently had such a jump after 
>> 150 hours. Some ocxo vendors are way more affected than others.
>> 
>> Nothing to worry unless it gets worse or happens more often over time.
>> 
>> Bye,
>> Said
>> 
>> Sent From iPhone
>> 
>> On Aug 31, 2013, at 10:48, Bob Stewart <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> My OCXO is a Trimble 34310-T that I bought from a China recycler a month or 
>>> so ago.  It has been very stable until this morning.  At about 10:30AM my 
>>> PLL showed a large blip during one segment  count (1PPS) and the DAC 
>>> started tracking upward to stabilize.  Then, 745 seconds later it glitched 
>>> in two successive segments and the PLL has tracked the DAC downward well 
>>> below the old stable number.  For an independent reference, I have my 8640B 
>>> self-locked inputting on Channel A of my 5335A with a large enough gate for 
>>> 8 decimal points of display.  My GPSDO is serving as the time reference for 
>>> the 5335A.  Give or take the stability of the 8640B, the counter seems to 
>>> agree with what my GPSDO is doing.
>>> 
>>> This is for hobby and learning, so no big deal, but I'm wondering if this 
>>> is how OCXOs start misbehaving in their dotage (so to speak).  On the one 
>>> hand, it gives me another insight into error handling for my PLL logic, 
>>> which is good.  But, on the other: I'm wondering if I should just give it a 
>>> proper burial and put in my spare?  Maybe I'll leave it in to see if any 
>>> other error modes develop, and then toss it when I finally have code I'm 
>>> willing to share.  Anyway, is this oscillator on its last legs?  I'm more 
>>> worried about letting out the magic smoke and damaging other components 
>>> than I am about accuracy at this point.  
>>> 
>>> Bob - AE6RV
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to