Re: time-nuts Digest, Vol 110, Issue 13 On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 19:52:17 -0400, [email protected] wrote: > Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:27:18 +0200 > From: Magnus Danielson <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] sub-minute time-precision in court-case > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 09/04/2013 12:19 AM, Tom Van Baak wrote: >>> Yeah, the question is even if you have a legal support for what correct >>> time or even traceable time actually is or means. I know countries that >>> does not even legally accept UTC. >>> >>> It could be better, way better. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Magnus >> Still, imagine Magnus collides with Tom. What time did it really happen? >> Does it help if we both have GPS? Both have cesium(s) in the back seat? >> At some point the notion of uncertainty and error bars needs to be allowed. > We both agree, but now it is about convincing a jury... or lawyers.
I can see it now - the focus will be on all that cesium spewed about, like with Fukushima. You'll never convince them that you are not radioactive. Joe Gwinn _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
