[email protected] said: > and I get the following graph. The error is system time compared to WR-time, > where we can assume that WR-time is very accurate. > http://www.anderswallin.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/ntp_graph.png
That's probably as good as you are going to get with NTP. How good do you want/expect? Overall goodness will depend upon what the machine is doing and/or the stability of the local temperature. If you like making graphs, watch drift from loopstats. I'd expect it to track temperature. > server 127.127.28.0 minpoll 4 maxpoll 4 Why did you force the polling to 16 seconds? Longer polling will average over more data. That might smooth out some of your noise. On the other hand, it will take longer to track temperature changes. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
