>One could try claiming that Loomis was the first to make detailed
>measurements of a Shortt, but it would take some digging to prove
>he was "first" and not just "one of the first".
Just FYI:
During my reading of BSTJ I noticed a reference to a paper by
Loomis and Marrington at bottom of p4:
www3.alcatel-lucent.com/bstj/vol11-1932/articles/bstj11-2-318.pdf
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
