Sorry, I must have missunderstood. I realise the internal reference is already a 10811, but I thought there was some concern that just the use of the external reference facility might be in some way responsible, so if that was the case then perhaps using an external 10811 might also be expected to cause the same problem?. If it did then that would potentially rules out any issues with the 3336. Regards Nigel GM8PZR In a message dated 03/03/2014 14:12:38 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes:
In message <[email protected]>, [email protected] writes: >What about replacing the 3336 external reference with something like an HP >10811 and checking what difference, if any, that makes? The internal reference is an 10811 already ? The point is not what delivers the reference, but if it is synchronized to the input signals being measured. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
