Hi Poul-Henning,

On 02/03/14 23:29, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

I have spent another evening playing around with the 5370 and the
conclusion is pretty ironclad now:

Running a 5370 with ext-ref locked to input frequencies is simply
a bad idea and should not be done.

Running it on the internal OCXO works fine.

Running it on another frequency *not* locked to the input frequenc
also works fine.

In both cases the errors are statistically well-behaved, and can
be treated with normal statistical methods, including the built-in
STD-DEV function.

But feeding ext-ref a frequency which is locked to the input frequencies
causes the errors to become systematic, and they can no longer be
treated as statistically well-behaved.

This comes as no surprise to me. I've expected this to be true for essentially all counters for ages. The relative timing of reference and trigger inputs interact with each others.

Running one of the input synchronous to the reference may not only create a maximum but also a minimum in noise. When inputs is asynchronous it is the average of this systematic pattern which is experienced.

For instance:  The length of the coax to ext-ref suddenly affect
your TI measurements, because it shifts the phase between the 200MHz
and the input signal.

I tried tuning up the A21 200MHz synthesizer to the best of my
ability, and it clearly made a difference, the phase pattern
of errors shifted around, but the errors did not get any smaller,
they just moved.

Which then gives support to your theory that it is the 200 MHz itself rather than systematics of the synthesizer as I was theorizing about. Thus, as you tune the synthesizer you only phase-shift around the transitions. OK. Fair enough, that is expected to happen too. The synthesizer probably needs to be very badly trimmed to cause systematics as I theorized.

I also tried disconnecting the "10 MHz present" circuit, that
didn't change the magnitude of the errors either, but did shift
the phase of the peak noise a couple of degrees.

I used it to clean of the 5 MHz overtones and systematics.

Looking at some old notes from years past which just didn't make
sense, does now.

Good that things becomes clearer.

Cheers,
Magnus

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to