Thanks Tom and Hal I was trying to understand what the change was and now I know the pix get bigger. I will keep that in mind for the future. Regards Paul.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Tom Van Baak (lab) <t...@leapsecond.com> wrote: > Paul, > > Your expectation works for text attachments. But binary attachments (e.g., > jpg) expand about 33%. That's 8/6, or log2(256)/log2(64), due to base64 > encoding of 8-bit bytes. > > In general, large attachments on this list are ok. It's just that when > they are above 128k they are temporarily held for manual review. I let most > of them go through with little delay. > > /tvb (i5s) > > > On Jul 11, 2014, at 9:21 AM, paul swed <paulsw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Trying to keep the message and attachements below the 128KB limit. > > I send a 119KB message and it gets held as a 165KB message. > > Can someone help me to understand the difference please? > > Thanks > > Paul > > WB8TSL > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.