Hi Is $1K to much for the budget or is $200K?
Are you after microseconds, nanoseconds, or picoseconds? Depending on what you are after, the range of “in the middle of the pack” moves around quite a bit. Bob On Jul 13, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Martin A Flynn <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Chris, > Timing source is a SyncServer 200 with the rubidium option. The > inter-building fiber is already budgeted as part of the IT and telecom > portion of the project. It adds no cost to the project to use it other then > the optical transceivers. > > That is where i need help - selecting the best product (in terms of > cost/performance) > > Martin > > On 7/13/2014 1:07 PM, Chris Albertson wrote: >> What accuracy requirements do you have. This could be easy or impossible. >> >> Don't spend to much money distributing 1PPS because you can have it >> any place you want for the cost of a GPS receiver. A second GPS >> receiver is likely cheaper than the cost of 120 meters of cable plus >> the cable drivers and receivers. Even if you build the cable system >> you'd need to test it which adds more time and cost. GPS is so cheap >> you can place them where needed. >> >> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Martin A Flynn <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I am working on a project where I need to transfer 1PPS approximately 120 >>> meters between buildings. I cam borrow a pair of 62.5 fibers from >>> IT/telco to do so. >>> >>> Playing cost / performance against one another, I am looking for a solution >>> somewhere in the middle that does not requires SM-28 single mode fiber) >>> >>> Martin > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
