> In the case of the TimePod, the data can be presented when you have *very* > few samples to work with. > That said, it is interesting to watch it bring up error bars (which are > indeed correctly calculated) > and then see the trace walk outside those error bars as the run progresses. > There are other measurements that are a bit less susceptible to this. > None of them have any magic to get around sqrt(N). > > Bob
Maybe I don't understand error bars. For a dynamic display like TimeLab, walking outside (1 sigma) error bars is expected about 1/3 of the time, no? /tvb _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
