Hi

About all I’d say is that if Jim Barnes said that’s the way to do it. then 
that’s the way to do it. There are only a very few people who I’d say that 
about. 

Bob

> On Nov 23, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Jim Lux <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I'm writing a short simulation program to generate samples from a analog 
> system with some op amps, etc., and I'm wondering if anyone has some 
> practical experience on picking parameters for the generator.
> 
> I'm generating minutes worth of data sampled at 1 kHz, and my opamps have 
> their flicker/white knee at around 3-4 Hz (at least that's what the LT1679 
> data sheet claims.. we shall see if the model matches the data sheet matches 
> what I measure on the actual hardware)
> 
> I'm using a Barnes-Jarvis (or Barnes-Greenhall) type generator for the 
> flicker noise, which basically sums up a bunch of stages to create an 
> arbitrarily smooth representation.  See threads:
> https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2010-April/046926.html
> https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2013-November/081534.html
> 
> The actual PTTI paper is
> 
> http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/1987papers/Vol%2019_19.pdf has the details
> http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/1992papers/Vol 24_44.pdf has some 
> corrections, but is a partial page..
> 
> You need to pick a few parameters:  how many stages to cover your frequency 
> band of interest, how big the frequency steps are (e.g. octaves), and where's 
> the "top band" filter cutoff (typically 0.3 to 0.5 relative to the sample 
> rate)
> 
> If you picked 4 stages, with a starting frequency of 0.4, and octaves(R=2), 
> then the individual filter cutoffs would be
> 0.4
> 0.2
> 0.1
> 0.05
> 
> I'm interested in the behavior down in the 1 Hz and below range, say, to 0.01 
> Hz.  So to cover 0.01 Hz to 1000Hz, one would need about 16-17 octaves which 
> is an enormous number of stages and I've got to believe you'd have all sorts 
> of numerical problems
> 
> And I think I don't need to do this
> I can add white noise to establish the noise floor to match lab measurements 
> (there's sources other than the op amps) for higher frequencies, say in the 
> 20-1000 Hz area.
> 
> It would seem, then, that I can start the first filter at around 5 Hz and go 
> down from there, if my assumption that most of the flicker noise is coming 
> from the opamp and it's flicker noise comes above the thermal noise at 3-4 Hz.
> 
> Then, going in, say, octave jumps, I can get down to 0.01 Hz in about 8 
> steps.  (this seems to match Figure 2 in the paper.. they used a 8 stages 
> with a frequency ratio of 2.4, and the spectrum looks pretty flat for a good 
> 5 decades.
> 
> I suppose I could just write it and see what comes out, but if someone out 
> there has worked with this kind of thing before, a bit of practical guidance 
> would be useful.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to