On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Chris Albertson <albertson.ch...@gmail.com > wrote:
> Those sub 1 u-second numbers are very good. They argue for using the BBB > as an NTP server but I wonder if it really is the best. I think the > numbers that matter are measures of the close on the computers who use your > BBB as a server. In other words the goal is to synchronize a set of > computers. Can The little BBB push accurate time out to a set of user > computers and keep then in sync better then some other NTP server platform? > When I think of what we have been using to run NTP down through the years, this is almost funny. The BBB is little in physical package size only. Its processing power is not inconsequential. Fuzzballs anyone? -- Brian Lloyd Lloyd Aviation 706 Flightline Drive Spring Branch, TX 78070 br...@lloyd.aero +1.210.802-8FLY (1.210.802-8359) _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
