Charles is absolutely correct this is what I have seen in these large splitters. I have a really nice one that you can take the cover off and look. Lots of screws. Regards Paul WB8TSL
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Charles Steinmetz <[email protected]> wrote: > Dave wrote: > > Yes, but I was aware of this, and that's why I got two different isolation >> figures. >> > > What I was pointing out is that there will be *4* different isolation > figures from any one output port, not just two. The lowest will be to the > one electrically adjacent output, next (a bit higher) will be to two > outputs at one remove, then (a bit higher yet) to four outputs twice > removed, and finally (the highest) to eight outputs thrice removed (these > eight are the ones you are calling "on the other 1:8 splitter"). > > Perhaps a diagram is in order (see below). Each dot represents a 1:2 > splitter. (I've drawn only 1:8. A 1:16 is just this plus another 1:8, > connected to the two outputs of another 1:2 splitter.) > > To find the worst case output-to-output isolation, you need to identify > two electrically adjacent output ports -- either by measurement or from the > manufacturer's published data. > > Best regards, > > Charles > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
