Bruce wrote:

Whilst the output signal of the barely class A JFET amplifier has a lower unwanted harmonic content and thus requires less filtering to achieve a given suppression of unwanted harmonics and/or subharmonics, the question of the flicker phase noise penalty incurred by the barely class A amplifier approach remains unresolved.

I posted the resolution a few days ago.

As I said then, I adjusted the bias and input parameters of my breadboard doubler to match the conditions under which the FETs are operated in the doubler posted on your site, and measured the change in noise (including in the flicker region). The noise decreased by a fraction of a dB. Accordingly, I conclude that the barely class A doubler's noise, including flicker noise, is within a fraction of a dB of a Class AB doubler using the same FETs that you consider optimized.

I also explained then why this result should come as no surprise (one FET in a Class AB or B doubler will not be contributing noise when it is cut off -- but that coincides with the other FET being at or near full current, so the total noise is dominated by the noise of the full-current FET and the benefit due to the cut-off FET is insignificant).

There may be quieter FETs with lower flicker noise corners available that have similar medium-cutoff characteristics and are, therefore, suitable for this use -- but for the reasons I have given, I believe that similar relative noise relationships between barely Class A and Class AB doublers using such FETs would hold for them, as well. NOTE: For anyone simulating JFET circuits, be aware that many available JFET models do not model flicker noise at all, and many of those that do are wildly inaccurate at simulating noise in the flicker region. As always, there is no substitute for building and measuring the circuit.

Best regards,

Charles



_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to