[email protected] said: > Don't have any good ideas for 14121 kHz. > Any thoughts?
I threw together a quick hack to scan for all PLL coefficients less than 50. Here are the answers closer than 50 kHz. (I didn't remove lines with a common factor.) 17 12 14166666.67 45667 24 17 14117647.06 3353 31 22 14090909.09 30091 34 24 14166666.67 45667 38 27 14074074.07 46926 41 29 14137931.03 16931 48 34 14117647.06 3353 So multiply by 24 and divide by 17 gets you a reasonable offset. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
