[email protected] said: > Am I reading this right -- those GPS receivers applied the leap second 16 > seconds before they were supposed to, resulting in a double 23:59:44 instead > of 23:59:59 and 23:59:60? So not only did they use GPS instead of UTC but > the opted for the double second instead of a valid leap second.
That's my reading. > 57203 86383.752 > $GPRMC,235943.000,A,3726.0874,N,12212.2628,W,1.71,186.96,300615,,*1A > 57203 86384.750 > $GPRMC,235944.000,A,3726.0866,N,12212.2630,W,1.33,180.14,300615,,*1D > 57203 86385.752 > $GPRMC,235944.000,A,3726.0858,N,12212.2631,W,1.10,178.01,300615,,*13 > 57203 86386.751 > $GPRMC,235945.000,A,3726.0850,N,12212.2632,W,1.18,179.98,300615,,*10 -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
