On 2015-07-04 15:01, Tom Van Baak wrote:
(the Japan earthquake in 2011 sped the earth up by 1.8 microseconds/day.
  The Sumatra quake on 26 Dec 2004 had a bigger effect: 6.8 microseconds)

Just in case you didn't know -- these are theoretical results only. There's a 
guy at JPL (Richard Gross) who does the calculations and any time there's a big 
seismic event he runs the simulations and out comes a number. That's pretty 
cool but the numbers so far are always smaller that what VLBI can actually 
measure. Still, it makes a nice press release and physics lesson.
Buried in the articles is sometimes a clarification like "the researchers concluded 
the Sumatra earthquake caused a length of day change too small to detect, but it can be 
calculated".
Some recent calculations:
NASA Details Earthquake Effects on the Earth
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2005-009
Chilean Quake May Have Shortened Earth Days
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2010-071
Japan Quake May Have Shortened Earth Days, Moved Axis
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2011-080
All Days Are Not Created Equal
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=15
See also:
http://geodesy.unr.edu/hanspeterplag/library/projects/tsunami_loading/RotGravSigSumatraEqv4_pre.pdf
"While the modeled change in the Earth’s rotation that should have been caused by 
the 2004 Sumatran earthquake is less than the uncertainty in present-day measurements of 
the Earth’s rotation, it is still worth examining the measurements to see if an 
earthquake induced signal is present."
http://www.obspm.fr/spip.php?page=imprimer&id_article=2193&lang=fr
"the effect in the movement of the pole should be of a few centimetres in the 
polhodie and of a few microseconds of time in the duration of the day, which is not very 
likely to be detected seen the current precision of the observations."
The Sumatran earthquake impact on Earth Rotation from satellite gravimetric 
measurements
https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00117348/document
"For the length of the day Chao & Gross (2006) modeled the increment of axial 
inertia moment and obtained a drop of 2-6 µs confirmed by our result (5 µs). This effect is 
undetectable in the LOD, because the precision on this parameter is of 20 µs."
This last paper is really interesting because it compares space-based models 
with terrestrial models.
And all this is of interest to time nuts because the earth is an oscillator and 
events like this affect the phase, frequency, and ADEV of the planet.

Thanks for the good and interesting refs.
One of the interesting points was that normal variations are multiples of those 
caused by earthquakes, and annual variations are up to 1ms and 1m.
Another was that the jet streams produce large short term variations caused by 
temperature differences.
Will this always turn up as an issue with all oscillators? ;^>

--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to