Hi,
You have too many 1s in your startup string compared to the expected "PRS_10\r".
If the MCU clock is not 10Mhz then the integrated UART rates will be off,
which should produce framing errors, but do UARTs still detect and systems
report these nowadays, or just pass along garbled data?
Otherwise, garbled data is most often a result of inadequate pin contact,
if the connectors are not seated properly, or the pins or sockets are loose
in their shells.
Age and rough treatment can have that effect.

"Internal hardware jumpers allow these pins to be configured as analog outputs
to monitor the lamp intensity and varactor voltage for complete compatibility
with the FRS."
Have you checked the jumpers in the manual Configuration Notes:
"Pin 4: TXD/PHOTO The default configuration uses this pin as an output for 
RS-232 data.
Many system parameters (including the lamp intensity) may be monitored via the 
RS-232
interface. The function of this pin may be changed to an analog monitor for the 
lamp
intensity by removing one resistor (R347) and installing a 10 kΩ resistor for 
another (R348)
on the microcontroller PCB."

On 2015-08-24 22:40, Brian M wrote:
I tried through the weekend, double and triple checking wiring and setup.
I've tried the following methods of getting serial comms working:
PRS10 -> Arduino Uno (with processor bypassed) -> USB Host
PRS10 -> Level Shifter -> BBB UART
PRS10 -> MAX232 -> USB Serial adapter

Shortly after power is applied to the PRS10, I do get a string of
characters. Believe it should be the model information. Instead I get:
wy+VPgy

I guess the good news is that this output appears consistent with each
power cycle of the device. And I'm getting the same results through all the
hookup methods I've tried.

My minicom settings are for software flow control at 9600 8N1 - from what
the manual states, this should be the right settings. I've tried screen as
well - and get the same text. I went crazy trying several other rates and
setting combinations. No luck.

Maybe I've missed something obvious.

I agree that getting comms going to the MCU are going to be an important
step. How do people address this type of problem? Scope the serial and try
to decode by hand? The 10Mhz to the MCU looks OK on a scope. Are there
further steps people try after that? If nothing else I think there's some
interesting stuff to learn here. I also wouldn't mind tearing out the
electronics, determining if the lamp is good, and attempt to build from
there. I don't know the datecode for the unit, the PCB is marked with a
datecode suggesting 2003? I don't have the full case. I'm trying to assess
what are reasonable next steps. How do I determine if the MCU is healthy?
If the MCU is fried, how do I determine if I just need to squeeze a new MCU
board in there?

Thanks! I appreciate the input so far!
- Brian

PS - after looking again at the signal on the scope, it does seem like it
is 9600 baud. ~100µS per bit. The data out on the MCU itself looks like
what I saw on the main connector.

On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 2:04 PM Mike Cook <[email protected]> wrote:


Le 22 août 2015 à 03:40, Bob Camp <[email protected]> a écrit :

Hi

On any microprocessor based gizmo, getting the micro running (again) is
generally priority number one. It sets everything up and gives you the
diagnostic
info you need to go further. Garbled serial is better than none at all.
It suggests
something short of a total MCU death spiral …

Bob

On Aug 21, 2015, at 7:26 PM, Brian M <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear list -

I have come into possession of a for parts prs 10. I'd like to try to
repair this device. What I've noticed so far. Serial is garbled. (Even
at
varying baud rates).

  You don’t say how you are connecting to the Rb. The manual states:
"RS-232 data is sent to the host on pin 4, received from the host on pin
7. The baud rate is
fixed at 9600 baud, 8 bits, no parity, with 1 start and 1 stop bit. No DTR
or CTS controls are
used; rather, the XON/XOFF protocol has been implemented. The transmit
drive level is 0
and 5 V, not the +/-12 V normally associated with RS-232. These levels are
compatible with
most RS-232 line receivers, but does not require their use (a TTL inverter
may be used
instead), hence simplifies the interface when used inside an instrument at
the sacrifice of
degraded noise immunity over long lines."

So make sure that you adhere to that.


Lamp isn't lit.

What’s the date code. Early versions may be reaching EOL, though 20yrs id
quoted.

Doesn't look great. I'd like to know
if anybody else has wandered down this path. What are common failure
modes?
Anything match up with what I describe? Voltages to check would be
helpful.
The 10MHz out looked okay on a scope. Haven't gone further yet. I
suspect
the crystal is fine.

Thanks in advance. Happy hacking!
- Brian
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to