On 3/2/16 1:52 PM, Tom Holmes wrote:
While we are off topic, just wanted to note that Jim Lux was mentioned and
pictured in an article in the latest CQ Magazine for being the keynote speaker
at the Microwave Update (MUD) conference last fall.
Thought the hams on the list would be interested.
Thanks, Jim, for being more than just a time nut!
I think we're all more than just time-nuts...
Folks on the list will get a kick out this:
At JPL, I'm project manager for a cubesat that will do some measurements
of HF signals, and it's all synchronized by GPS. That is, you tell it
"at GPS time X, record Y seconds at frequency Z".
We get GPS time from the spacecraft as week and milliseconds of week.
There was a huge discussion at a design review (prompted by my section
manager, Charley Dunn, who has had a big role in most of JPL's GPS
receivers, blackjack, rogue, turbo rogue, etc., and who has had his
share of synchronization and roll-over issues) about whether the week
number was 0-1023 or since 1980 epoch, and how would we handle roll over
(in 2019.. we might still be in orbit and functional). (week 860 having
recently occurred, of course)
And then a whole bunch of questions about "how will you test that you
are synchronized properly", since we claim to start the sampling within
1 microsecond of the specified time.
All grist for the time-nuts list that has been covered over the last few
years in one form or another.
Most of the other review board members are going "why is this is an issue".
Those of us who are time-nuts, though, know that this is the issue. Is
the message before or after the 1pps tick? What happens if you miss a
message or a tick? what if the message overlaps the tick? what if the
week rolls over during a measurement? We've all been caught.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
