In case you missed the significance of Tom's clarification below, note that the thermal conductivity of helium is 6 times that of air and the heat capacity of helium is 5 times that of air. These are big differences!

We once built a GCMS for NASA; two were landed on Mars. Modules of the GCMS were heated to 225° C in operation by various foil and wire wound heaters. Tested in one atmosphere of air or in 25 millibar CO2 (Mars atmosphere), these heaters worked well. At one point during organic cleaning, I happened to run the heaters in helium at slightly lower than atmospheric pressure; the heaters could not be heated to 225° C because of the characteristics of helium.

Helium has unusual properties!

Larry


On 3/12/2016 3:03 AM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
Neville,

Apparently it's not vacuum mounted, but helium filled. Lots of good info here:

http://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/pdfs/IssuePDFs/1965-03.pdf

/tvb

----- Original Message -----
From: "Neville Michie" <[email protected]>
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 2:19 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] quartz thermometers


It always puzzled me that quartz crystals would be considered prime temperature 
sensors.
I can see that an instrument could be built that reliably showed many decimal 
places of reading,
but I could never accept that a vacuum mounted quartz crystal would be closely 
enough
thermally coupled to whatever was having its temperature measured.
...

--
Best wishes,

Larry McDavid W6FUB
Anaheim, California  (SE of Los Angeles, near Disneyland)
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to