> > I would like to announce the public availabilty of two software projects > which I have been working on for my master thesis: > > * LibPLN: a portable C++ library for the efficient simulation of Powerlaw > Noise (PLN) >
Do you get agreement between PLN time-series and calcluated ADEVs, as per IEEE1139-2008 table B.2 ? I tried [3] using python libraries colorednoise [1] (also based on Kasdin&Walter) and allantools [2], but it gives ADEVs that are systematically higher than predicted by theory. OTOH the calculated MDEVs seem to fall on the line that theory predicts. Image here: http://www.anderswallin.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/colorednoise-1.png On your libPLN page the time-series graph is called 'time deviation' which could be a bit confusing as there is also an ADEV-like statistic called time deviation. Perhaps time-series or 'phase observations' or similar is better? Anders [1] https://github.com/jleute/colorednoise [2] https://github.com/aewallin/allantools [3] https://github.com/jleute/colorednoise/blob/master/example_noise_slopes.py _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
