http://www.prc68.com/I/Sensors.shtml#Gyroscopic
"A note on gyros.  When located in a dynamic platform, like an airplane, the 
gyro needs to be located at the center of mass of the vehicle.  This way when 
the plane banks, pitches or yaws the gyro will only respond to the angles.  But 
if it's located anywhere else it will be in error.  This applies to models as 
well as to full size vehicles."
This is not true. You can - and people do - mount gyros (interial systems) 
anywhere in the rigid part of the body - wingtip mount might be a bad idea...
If the gyro is away from the center of rotation it will experience the same 
rotation and also an acceleration. The chosen gyro should be good enough at 
separating rotation from acceleration. This has not been a problem for a very 
long time - 40+ years - for typical aviation nav systems.
For specialized applications - say spinning munitions - where your performance 
is really limited by acceleration - you should keep your sensors at the center. 
The same could be said for accelerometers, oscillators and many other sensors 
that might have errors amplified by the extra acc.
--      Björn




Sent from my smartphone.-------- Original message --------From: Brooke Clarke 
<bro...@pacific.net> Date: 27/07/2016  01:00  (GMT+01:00) To: Discussion of 
precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> Subject: Re: 
[time-nuts] Q/noise of Earth as an oscillator 
Hi Hal:

I resemble that remark.

Momentum and drift.  It's interesting that the drift rate depends on the 
physical volume.  See table at: 
http://www.prc68.com/I/Sensors.shtml#Gyroscopic
http://www.prc68.com/I/Gyroscopes.html

-- 
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
The lesser of evils is still evil.

-------- Original Message --------
> att...@kinali.ch said:
>> I am not sure you can apply this definition of Q onto earth. Q is defined
>> for harmonic oscillators (or oscillators that can be approximated by an
>> harmonic oscillator) but the earth isn't oscillating, it's rotating. While,
>> for time keeping purposes, similar in nature, the physical description of
>> both are different.
> What do gyroscope-nuts use to describe the quality of their toys?
>
>

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to