Well, it is nothing but his personal recollection of the events, so that is expected. It represents one voice of several. Better have that on record than it being lost. But it is not the complete story. That would have to be collected over a much larger set of people.

BTW. Ref 44 in this paper is one of Edson's articles.

I've read Chapter 15 of Edson's book, and it provides a model, but fail to include flicker noise, which is in Leesons model. It is a straight-forward extension thought. I don't have access to any of his articles, except the one-page letter that Rick linked.

There is surely more work to be done to build a more comprehensive detail of events, show where ideas came up, was re-invented, incorporated and extended. Edson clearly contributed.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 08/07/2016 06:32 PM, KA2WEU--- via time-nuts wrote:
Here is another comment ;


this paper is too self-centered for it to be the  reliable historical
report which we would like.
It seems that Edson did some great work before,


73 de Ulrich , and I agree with the statement





http://www.tubebooks.org/Books/vto.pdf

Vacuum tube oscillators


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx


In a message dated 8/6/2016 9:02:43 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:

Good  morning,

yes I saw the reference  but he did not point out what it  was or
function,
This paper is more about people and events and very  little since  .......

Ulrich


In a message dated  8/6/2016 2:26:54 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:

On Sat,  Aug 6, 2016 at 9:34  AM, KA2WEU--- via time-nuts
<[email protected]>   wrote:

Leeson produced a somewhat random selection of papers  ,  omitting
important
things like the sapphire based best in  the word .  This was not even
referenced  .

The  reference [145] at the  end of the sentence that mentions  sapphire
oscillators also discusses a  hybrid photonic-microwave  oscillator that
incorporates a room-temperature  sapphire oscillator  so I think he
tried to cover both subjects with that  single  reference.

The paper has a misleading title. It suggests that it   is a history of
the last 50 years, when it is about events roughly 50  years  ago. The
abstract makes this clear though. So I didn't really  expect to  read
much about developments past   1970.

Cheers
Michael


On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 9:34  AM,  KA2WEU--- via time-nuts
<[email protected]> wrote:
 Some of  the cited references are poor, modern non-linear mathematic  is

kind
 of omitted . After all the oscillator   phase noise  speculation, I would
have really liked to see at  last a reference  about the most modern
measurements   techniques and it validation.  How do you calibrate a
phase
noise  test
system.

Leeson  produced a somewhat random  selection of papers , omitting
important
 things like the  sapphire based best in the word . This was not even
  referenced  .

I think he is really out of it   .

73 de N1UL



In a  message  dated 8/5/2016 7:11:18 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
 [email protected]  writes:


Very selected and  incomplete  references and the equally    important
 question
of measurements strangely  not   covered

73 de N 1   UL


 I suppose he could  write an  equally-lengthy article on measurements
alone,
but leaving  out the  post-1970s history entirely was a  little
 disappointing.  It was strange  to hit "ctrl-f Rohde"  and see  only one
reference in the
bibliography.   Same for   "Hewlett."  "Rubiola" brings up one hit (but no
citations)   and  "Stein" brings up none at all.

-- john,   KE5FX
Miles Design  LLC


  _______________________________________________
time-nuts    mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and  follow  the  instructions there.

  _______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing  list  -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow  the  instructions  there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts  mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to