Rick on the pll DRO I agree with you for today. So is it built for 9180 and then the 12.63 is mixed with it? Or is it actually a direct PLL precisely at the frequency so not even the synthesizer is used? Regards Paul WB8TSL
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:40 PM, bownes <[email protected]> wrote: > Not to mention there is not so sensitive film, sensitive film and really > sensitive film. > > Good old orthographic film took minutes in bright light. > > > > > On Nov 4, 2016, at 20:24, Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > -------- > > In message <[email protected]>, David writes: > > > >> Various online sources say that natural rubidium is radioactive enough > >> to fog photographic film in 1 to 2 months but that is also the case > >> with unprocessed uranium ore so I would not worry about it at all. > > > > Yes, that sounds about right for an isotope with a 40 billion years > > half-life. > > > > 1 to 2 months is a LOOOONG time for photographic film. > > > > -- > > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > > [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by > incompetence. > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
