Mark wrote:
The tricky bit is interpolating signal levels between logged points (there is a display options for showing the raw signal level data). Heather interpolates between adjacent azimuth points at each elevation angle.
I always wondered about the "filled in" (interpolated) plot. To my observation, the orbital tracks of the satellites do not wander anywhere near +/- 22.5 degrees. It is unclear to me that interpolating the data to areas of the sky where satellites never appear has any utility.
I suppose it makes trends somewhat easier to spot -- but that could also be done just by making the dots on the raw chart a bit larger, without suggesting a continuity of reception-space that doesn't exist.
Or am I missing something? Charles _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
