I put some raw data here:

http://www.patoka.ca/OCXO/60HZ.logs.tar.Z


Unfortunately its not continuous, because of for some period of times my machine was offline (software upgrades or my radio made some mess with RF which affects the MCU and recordings. And I was busy with something else to check what was going on there...

The format is very simple:

# [Time Stamp]            [Period]              [1/9830400]
16-12-05 22:00:56.683 [-] 0.01667439778643      163916  -49
16-12-05 22:02:04.976 [-] 0.01667348225909      163907  +9
16-12-05 22:03:13.253 [-] 0.01666941324869      163867  +40

The column [-/+/0] just indicate if periods is up or down from the "golden standard"
The [1/9830400] - is the what the timer(counter) value was
and the last column is just a delta with previous measurement

Note: the device itself catch each and every zero-cross event 8192 times, and then do averaging (simple shift to the right the big counter value). Then it took this averaged value, translate it to main periods and prints the results as [Period]

Regards,
Vlad



On 2017-01-03 11:41, Artek Manuals wrote:
Vlad

do you have that data for a longer period of time...say 3 to 6 months?

Dave



On 1/3/2017 11:05 AM, Vlad wrote:


Speaking about MAIN... I was interesting to see if "leap second" event has correlation with MAIN frequency fluctuation

Here is graphs for the MAIN periods recorded. Note: The data on the charts is "smoothed" by Bezier curves

I could see some "surge" which starts to climb in December 30 and end at Dec 31 at the time close to the "leap second" event. But not sharp.

For 16-12-29 00:00 to 17-01-02 00:00
http://www.patoka.ca/OCXO/60hz-periods-Dec29-Jan2.png


For Dec 31:
http://www.patoka.ca/OCXO/60hz-periods-Dec31.png


It will be interesting to see/compare if anybody else has similar stats.

Regards,
Vlad


On 2017-01-02 13:00, Tim Shoppa wrote:
What modern loads are actually sensitive to high (say, +10 to +20%) line
voltage?

Old incandescent light bulbs were among the most sensitive loads in the past (so much so, that 130V light bulbs were commonly available from the
industrial suppliers).

I would naively expect the modern CFL's and LED replacements to be fine with higher line voltage because they have their own built-in switching
regulation.

A lot of modern electronic equipment with switching supplies, are just fine
at +20% line voltage and may even run cooler.

Tim N3QE

On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Bill Byrom <t...@radio.sent.com> wrote:

There are a couple of recent threads concerning the power line mains
voltage standards. After a bit of research and thinking, I have found
that this is a complex topic. The simple answer is:


* The standard in the US for the past 50 years has been 120/240 V +/- 5%
  RMS at the service entrance to the building. This is a range of
  114/228 V to 126/252 V.
* The load voltage could be as low as 110/220 V and as high as 125/250 V
  and be within specifications.


There are two voltage measurement points to consider:

(1) Service voltage: This is the RMS voltage measured at the service
    entrance to the building (at the metering point).
(2) Utilization voltage: This is the RMS voltage measured at the load. It might be measured at an unused socket in a power strip feeding several pieces of electronic equipment, for example. There are of
    course many different utilization voltages present in a home or
    business, depending on where you make the measurement.


Most US homes and small businesses are powered by what is commonly
called a "split-phase" 240 V feed. The final distribution system
transformer has a 240 V center-tapped secondary. The center tap is
grounded, and three wires are fed to the building (actually it might be
up to around 6 houses):
(1) Leg L1 or phase A (red wire) -- This wire will measure 120 V to the
    neutral or 240 V to Leg L2.
(2) Neutral (white wire) -- This wire is grounded at the distribution
    system and at the service entrance to the building.
(3) Leg L2 phase B (black wire) -- This wire will measure 120 V to the
    neutral or 240 V to Leg L1.


Large appliances and HVAC systems are usually connected across L1-L2
(240 V), while most sockets are on circuits either connected across L1-
neutral (120 V) or L2-neutral (120 V).


The voltages I have described are the current standardized values for the service voltage which have been in general use for about 50 years (120/240 V +/- 5%). I believe that the original systems installed before 1940 were designed for a 110/220 V nominal service voltage, but after a report in 1949 the nominal service voltage was increased to 117/234 V, as specified in ANSI C84.1-1954. After research in actual buildings, in the 1960's the nominal service voltage was increased again, to 120/240 V in the ANSI C84.1-1970 standard. The purpose is to keep the utilization
voltage at the load above 110/220 V.


The voltage at the service entrance should in most cases be in Range A (120/240V +/-5%). On each 120V leg the service voltage should therefore be between 114 and 126 V. The utilization voltage at the load should be
between 110 and 125 V due to losses in building wiring.


See details of the current specifications at:

http://www.pge.com/includes/docs/pdfs/mybusiness/
customerservice/energystatus/powerquality/voltage_tolerance.pdf


These voltage specifications were designed for resistive loads and
measurement of the true RMS voltage. In most electronic equipment built over the past 50 years, the power supply input circuitry is basically a rectifier connected to a smoothing capacitor. This leads to high input
current surges during the peaks of the waveform, so that the peak
voltage is reduced much more by the building wiring resistance than if
the load was resistive for the same power consumption.


So the waveform shape at different utilization locations in a building (with active equipment loads) may be different, so the voltage measured by different AC measuring instruments can differ. Many meters are full
wave average measuring but calibrated so they only read RMS voltage
correctly on pure sinewaves. Other meters are true RMS measuring and
will read very close the correct RMS voltage even if the waveform is
distorted.
-- Bill Byrom N5BB





On Sun, Jan 1, 2017, at 12:16 PM, CIW308 VE6OH wrote:

> Mark,

>

> CSA have standards for over and under voltage, Typical no more that 3%
> over and 5% under if memory serves me.

>

> This might help (

> http://www.safetyauthority.ca/sites/default/files/csa-
fia3660-voltagedropcalc.pdf
> )

> The power companies here in Alberta are generally good about fixing

> problems with line regulation.

> There can be problems with industrial areas and big welders or motors
> staring as I am sure you know.

> I am sure they do not want the bill for replacing equipment that was

> subjected to over voltage.

>

> On UPSs: I am sure you are aware that may of them are not TRUE
> sine wave
> so the DMM may not read correctly.

>

> Mitch


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


--
WBW,

V.P.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to