On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 7:08 PM, John Ackermann N8UR <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Andrew -- > > There seems to be more than a little magic involved in getting sane > three-corner measurements. I've gotten best results when the run is long > enough to have many data points per tau, and also that results when you're > noise limited tend to go imaginary. Finally, I think things work best when > the three sources have similar noise processes, e.g., looking at 3x OCXO or > 3x Rb or whatever. >
Thanks. I'm not even complaining here, like I said, this is more visibility than I've had in the past, and the TICC is looking pretty good. As for more points, that was just the first 9 or so hours of a 24-hour run, which is now completed. At the end of that, it's more reasonable: http://i.imgur.com/7v3obqy.png — although I'm certainly not putting much faith in anything past 1000s. And the non-hat plot: http://i.imgur.com/xWTsqCX.png . Andrew _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
