On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:37:54PM +0100, emmanuel.fuste--- via time-nuts wrote:
> Here you have bulletin H from Observatoire de Paris (responsible for SYRTE > and IERS/ICRS,IRTS) > https://syrte.obspm.fr/tfc/temps/outgoing_data/laboTAF/bulH/ > And here the monitoring of the TDF162 signal from Observatoire de Paris. > https://syrte.obspm.fr/tfc/temps/outgoing_data/france_inter/ Interesting! > I was looking for real interest from times-nuts for TDF162 for a long time ! > Here we are. Well, I did post to time-nuts about TDF162's handling of the leapsecond back in early January, concluding that it was inserted a minute too early. See https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-January/103083.html with a more detailed analysis added later at the bottom of http://pa3fwm.nl/signals/leapsecond-2016/ . Unfortunately, a person at CFHM that I managed to contact about this, wasn't interested in looking at my data and insisted the leapsecond had been handled correctly. I don't know who is right; one could argue that TDF's specification is not totally unambiguous about this point. All I can say for sure is that it is very odd that TDF transmitted its 23:58 UTC end-of-minute marker one second later than DCF and MSF did (which otherwise use a rather similar encoding as TDF). Regards, Pieter-Tjerk, PA3FWM _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
