Hi Yes the numbers are correct, the NAC pulls roughly 10X the power of a CSAC.
Bob > On Apr 6, 2017, at 8:11 PM, paul swed <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jim am I reading the casc power consumption correctly? .12 and .14 W. > Thats 10X lower. > Any idea on the $$ > Regards > Paul > WB8TSL > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:11 PM, jimlux <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Here's a quick summary of the datasheet performance between the >> Vectron/Accubeat NAC1 and the MicroSemi CSAC. Bear in mind that Microsemi >> now has a wider temp range (i'm using the old rev J datasheet) >> >> CSAC is 1/10th the power >> NAC1 has a better crystal, so the phase noise is better >> the "atomic" part is comparable in performane >> >> >> Parameter NAC1 CSAC >> Aging 3E-10/mo 9E-10 >> 1E-9/yr 10E-9 >> >> ADEV 2E-11 @ 100sec 2.5E-11 >> 8E-11 @ 10 8E-11 >> 2E-10 @ 1 sec 2.5E-10 >> >> phase noise >> -86 @ 10 -70 >> -120 @ 100 -113 >> -138 @ 1000 -128 >> -143 @ 10k -135 >> -148 @ 100k -140 >> -150 floor >> >> max chg 1E-9 (-20 to 65) 5E-10 (-10 to 35) >> >> pwr 1.2W op 0.12 >> 1.8W warm 0.14 >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m >> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
