Poul-Henning, Magnus, et al. thanks for your suggestions - they were not in vain.
As promised, I started setting up dual asynchronous sources experiment and performed a quick sanity check. What I have [unsurprisingly] found is that at this level controlled environment is a problem in itself. For example, undoing input signal SMA connector by one turn shifted my results by around 3.5ps - close to expected figure but still inconvenient. I'll have to plan the setup before I build and validate it, otherwise the results are not trustworthy. I hope this message makes it to the list - my previous one didn't. I am staying off the list for now. Thanks Leo P.S. I do know about torque wrenches. On 29 Nov 2017, at 21:51, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Lock it to the same frequency as your reference signal, but set it > for pure sine output slightly offset in frequency (10.000010/9.999990 > MHz), so that your know your TI sweeps the entire window. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
