Hal! On Tue, 03 Apr 2018 13:06:43 -0700 Hal Murray <[email protected]> wrote:
> > What would you guys suggest as the cheapest way to see jitter down
> > to around 1 nano second?
>
> What do you mean by "jitter" and what do you really want to do?
I mean jitter as NTP defines jitter. Whatever that is.
> Jitter usually needs a reference. Do you have one?
I have a GPSDO, but that was why I was looking to add the Rubidium
standard to the mix.
> Do you have a scope?
Yup, still got my trusty Tek 465B, and it still works fine. Cost
almost as much as a car when I bought it.
> The Rigol DS1102E is/was quite popular and is good for close to a
> ns.
Nice, but not quite fast enough. I've settled on the Rb+TAPR-TICC
solution.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
[email protected] Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpM_n6RkD_uQ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
