That is the specified jitter. They have also said in communications that it has about 50mS resolution. That is as close as they are willing to say a system can be synchronized with it. Perhaps someone will discover a clever way to enhance that.
BTW, I have been told it has also been successfully tested for lock in Brazil. Is there anyone in Australia want to give it a try? Perth is almost directly opposite Fort Collins. :-) David N1HAC On 12/4/18 2:00 PM, Hal Murray wrote: As was said, IRQ delay is +/-100 mS from the second edge, hardly what a Time-Nut is looking for. There is no problem with a delay as long as it is constant. If I know what it is, then I can correct for it. The problem is the noise/jitter on the delay. I'm sure somebody will have data soon. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com and follow the instructions there.
