Thanks again.  I have some MCL T1-6T transformers sitting here so maybe they 
will work. 

Regards,

Jerry


> On Dec 19, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Bruce Griffiths <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> NIST used off the shelf RF transformers in their mixers based  on diode 
> connected (collector connected directly to base) 2N2222. The transformer 
> impedance ratios (!:5 IIRC) are specified in the papers on the mixer 
> performance. 
> Suitable transformers are made by Minicircuits and others.
> 
> Bruce
> 
>> On 20 December 2018 at 07:04 Jerry Hancock <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks to all that replied, lots of good info which will take me months to 
>> sort through, especially the link to Jürg Kögel looks helpful as well as a 
>> note from Bert.
>> 
>> Attila, Yes, more phase noise than long term though this is really an 
>> exercise to get a better understanding of oscillators and measurement 
>> techniques.
>> 
>> The 2n2222 mixer sounds like another H-mode, I’ll have to look at it.  It 
>> probably uses self-wound, micro-sized bobbins which will be a challenge for 
>> me :-].
>> 
>> Bob, I think you were the person who pointed me to the loose PLL a while 
>> back.  The circuit I am building used a gain of 300ish (30k/100) and I 
>> expect that to really clip when unlocked.  I have a 10-turn variable in the 
>> circuit to bring it close initially. 
>> 
>> Another question or if you can point me to the method, if you are using 
>> quadrature signals, is the measurement then the geometric sum? Or do you mix 
>> them back together?  I am using a 3457a on the PD after an amp right now and 
>> I would think you would need either another meter, which I have, or a 
>> scanner, again I have both.  
>> 
>> My N2PK VNA uses two 24bit, low noise ADCs (LTC2410) for the same purpose 
>> more or less. It has effectively two DC receivers with two DDS. I can throw 
>> away the DDS and mixers and just read the DC voltage.  I have a second N2PK 
>> board I never finished as I planned to use another master oscillator on it 
>> with lower PN, but I needed a couple of parts and my tremor made SMD 
>> soldering difficult.  This was one of the drivers for my interest in phase 
>> noise. Now that I think about it, I can repurpose the second board, 
>> bypassing the MC1496 mixers. They are filtered to be close to DC within a 
>> few hz and has -135dB noise floor.  I can even change the input filter to 
>> use the 220 ohm/.0046uf R/C recommended.
>> 
>> I wish there was a way to use or modify one of my 8568B Spectrum analyzers 
>> to do this.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Jerry
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 19, 2018, at 7:57 AM, Attila Kinali <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hoi Jerry,
>>> 
>>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 23:18:42 -0800
>>> jerry <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I'm playing around with various methods of collecting data for
>>>> oscillator testing and would like to try the loose PLL which
>>>> requires a phase detector (PD).  
>>> 
>>> I guess you are looking more into phase noise than stability?
>>> 
>>>> I'm testing an AD8302 but that has a flat spot around 176 to 180 degrees.
>>> 
>>> All phase detectors exhibit non-linearity in some form or other.
>>> If you get all the way to +/-176° with good linearity, then be
>>> happy. If you need more than that, then you have to either use
>>> two phase detectors that are driven with a reference that is 90°
>>> apart, or you have to digitize the signal and do the same in digital.
>>> 
>>>> One of the papers I read recommended the subject PD but it is out of
>>>> stock everywhere, including the subs. One Minicircuits PD is in stock but
>>>> pricey.  I can try a double balanced mixer like the SBL or TUF series 
>>>> (which
>>>> I have on hand) but I thought maybe someone on the list has the subject PD
>>>> they dont need. If so, please send me a note.
>>> 
>>> There is a decent alternative: Use two transformers and 4 2N2222 to
>>> do your own mixer. The quality of it, according to NIST[1] is pretty
>>> good. I assume that any other NPN transistor of similar make-up will
>>> also do and lead to same/similar performance.
>>> 
>>> You might also want to have a look at Enrico's Mixer Tutorial[2]
>>> 
>>>> I'm slowly gathering parts for Riley's small Dual Mixer Time Difference
>>>> test kit but it will take some time which I'm unfortunately running out
>>>> of due to mild Parkinsons getting in the way of SMD soldering. I've used
>>>> my HP 5371a in the past but it sounds like a jet engine.  I recently
>>>> ordered a TICC as well.  By the time I'm done I probably will have
>>>> purchased more than a commercial  product, ha!
>>> 
>>> Jürg Kögel did a redesign of the Riley DMTD earlier this year,
>>> which looks very nice. And the measurements I've seen are very
>>> impressive (it's on par with the best state of the art I am aware of).
>>> So you might want to contact him and see whether he has some board left.
>>> 
>>>                     Attila Kinali
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [1] "Residual PM Noise Evaluation of Radio Frequecny Mixers"
>>> by Barnes, Hati, Nelson, Howe, 2011
>>> https://doi.org/10.1109/FCS.2011.5977868
>>> http://time.kinali.ch/mixers/residual_pm_noise_evaluation_of_radio_frequency_mixers-2011-barnes_hati_nelson_howe-05977868.pdf
>>> 
>>> [2] "Tutorial on the double-balanced mixer"
>>> by Enrico Rubiola, 2006
>>> http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0608211
>>> -- 
>>> It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All 
>>> the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no 
>>> use without that foundation.
>>>                -- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neal Stephenson
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>>> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
>> and follow the instructions there.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to 
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to