Thanks Tom for your quick and extensive reply. 
Indeed I confused Time Interval with Phase Difference….... 

Corrected calc: 
4/ [(Xi+2 - Xi+1) - (Xi+1 - Xi)]^2 = [(To + Ti+2) - 2(To + Ti+1) + (To + Ti)]^2 
= [Ti+2 - 2Ti+1 + Ti]^2 
=  (Ti+2)^2 + 4(Ti+1)^2 + (Ti)^2 + 2(-2Ti+2*Ti+1 + Ti+2*Ti - 2Ti+1*Ti)

5/ <(Ti+1)^2> # <(Ti+1)^2> #  < (Ti)^2> for large samples and  
<(Ti+a * Ti+b)> = 0 as Ti+1 and Ti are independent
Then AVAR =  (1/2Tau^2) * 6 < (Ti)^2>  = (1/Tau^2) * 6  * SigmaTIC^2

6/ Hence ADEV = sqrt(3) * SigmaTIC / Tau

So ADEV(Tau=1)  = 1.73 * SigmaTIC (indeed…)

By the way, it also seems that HDEV at Tau=1 is  2/sqrt(3) * Sigma = 1.15 
SigmaTIC

Best, 
Gilles.

 


> Le 30 déc. 2018 à 07:14, Tom Van Baak <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
> Hi Gilles,
> 
> Correct, the log-log slope will be -1.
> 
> But I'm not sure about your ADEV and SigmaTIC claim.
> 
> Assume the 53132A has 150 ps RMS resolution. The standard deviation is also 
> 150 ps. The Allan deviation at tau=1 would be 1.73 * 150 ps/s or 2.60e-10.
> 
> Look at calc_adev() in http://leapsecond.com/tools/adev_lib.c and note the 
> three data[] terms. With multiple uncorrelated terms you simply sum the 
> variances. There are three terms so that's 3 * stdev. When you convert AVAR 
> to ADEV the 3 becomes sqrt(3), or 1.73. Make sense?
> 
> For extra credit, note that MDEV at tau=1 is the same as ADEV. However, TDEV 
> at tau=1 is 1.50e-10, the same as stdev. In the same file, see that the 
> sqrt(3) factor is removed in calc_tdev().
> 
> ----
> 
> The best and largest pile of ADEV documentation is:
> 
> "information about frequency stability analysis"
> http://www.wriley.com/Freq%20Stab%20Analy%20Links.htm
> 
> There is also a wikipedia page:
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_variance
> 
> For simpler introductions see:
> 
> "Analysis of Time Domain Data"
> https://tf.nist.gov/phase/Properties/four.htm
> 
> "Clock Performance and Performance Measures"
> https://tycho.usno.navy.mil/mclocks2.html
> 
> "Fundamentals of Time and Frequency"
> https://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/1498.pdf
> 
> ----
> 
> If you want to play with ADEV check out Stable32 [1] or TimeLab [2]. Both are 
> highly recommended and are also free. For questions like yours the Stable32 
> noise generator feature is very useful to explore the shape(s) of ADEV for 
> given noise types. It was used to create:
> 
> "Exploring Allan Deviation"
> http://leapsecond.com/pages/allan/Exploring_Allan_Deviation_v2.pdf
> 
> /tvb
> 
> [1] http://www.stable32.com/
> [2] http://www.ke5fx.com/timelab/readme.htm
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Club-Internet Clemgill" <[email protected]>
> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" 
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2018 2:28 PM
> Subject: [time-nuts] TIC Characterization
> 
> 
>> Hi, 
>> Looking to testing my HP53132A in TIC mode. 
>> I considered the Time Interval measurement technique: 
>> The start channel is connected to a 1 PPS signal, and to the stop channel 
>> though a coax cable (constant delay line).
>> I found some references on the web, but no one with the associated maths.
>> So I tried the following :
>> 
>> 1/ AVAR  =  (1/2*Tau^2) * < [(Xi+2 - Xi+1) - (Xi+1 - Xi)]^2 >
>> with (Xi+1 - Xi) = phase difference = time interval 
>> 
>> 2/ Phase difference = To + Ti 
>> where To is the constant delay between start and stop (coax line)
>> and Ti is the counter's resolution at time i
>> 
>> 3/ Assuming that Ti is a Central Gaussian distribution then:
>> mean = < Ti > = 0 and variance = < Ti ^2> = SigmaTIC^2
>> 
>> 4/ [(Xi+2 - Xi+1) - (Xi+1 - Xi)]^2 = [(To + Ti+1) - (To + Ti)]^2 = (Ti+1 - 
>> Ti)^2 
>> =  (Ti+1)^2 + (Ti)^2 - 2(Ti+1 * Ti)
>> 
>> 5/ <(Ti+1)^2> #  < (Ti)^2> for large samples and 
>> <2(Ti+1 * Ti)> = 0 because Ti+1 and Ti are independent
>> Then AVAR =  (1/2Tau^2) * 2< (Ti)^2>  = (1/Tau^2) * SigmaTIC^2
>> 
>> 6/ Hence ADEV = SigmaTIC / Tau
>> 
>> So ADEV (log log) is a straight line with -1 slope
>> And ADEV(Tau=1) provides the standard deviation = SigmaTIC  of the Time 
>> Interval Counter's resolution 
>> 
>> Is this right ? 
>> Thanks to point me at related articles or web pages if you know any.
>> 
>> Gilles. 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
>> and follow the instructions there.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to 
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to