Oops, my bad. I think it was a BT cut. But the BT cut
isn't any better on warmup than an AT cut, right?
I don't know much about the 10544. It was already obsolete
by the time I started at HP 40 years ago.
Rick N6RK
On 8/5/2019 10:20 AM, Scott Newell wrote:
At 10:25 AM 8/5/2019, [email protected] wrote:
The 10811 is a SC cut crystal oscillator and the 10544 is an AT cut.
I thought the 10544 used a BT rock. Seems like I measured the warmup
curve of my 5345A to verify this, but maybe I'm confusing something else.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.
